John Legend Flexes his Civic muscles

In 2009, John Legend, a renowned artist, responds to the New York Post’s publication of a controversial cartoon that allegedly depicted President Obama as a wild ape being gunned down by a New York City police officer.  Legend’s open letter is a perfect example of active civic duty. You too can speak out against hate, racism, ignorance, acts that impact the quality of life,  intolerance as well as share your ideas on topics that affect our global community.

Cartoon that sparked John Legends open letter

Open Letter to the New York Post

Dear Editor:

I’m trying to understand what possible motivation you may have had for publishing that vile cartoon depicting the shooting of the chimpanzee that went crazy.  I guess you thought it would be funny to suggest that whomever was responsible for writing the Economic Recovery legislation must have the intelligence and judgment of a deranged, violent chimpanzee,20and should be shot to protect the larger community.  Really?  Did it occur to you that this suggestion would imply a connection between President Barack Obama and the deranged chimpanzee?  Did it occur to you that our President has been receiving death threats since early in his candidacy?  Did it occur to you that blacks have historically been compared to various apes as a way of racist insult and mockery?  Did you intend to invoke these painful themes when you printed the cartoon?

If that’s not what you intended, then it was stupid and willfully ignorant of you not to connect these easily connectable dots..  If it is what you intended, then you obviously wanted to be grossly provocative, racist and offensive to the sensibilities of most reasonable Americans.  Either way, you should not have printed this cartoon, and the fact that you did is truly reprehensible.  I can’t imagine what possible justification you have for this.  I’ve read your lame statement in response to the outrage you provoked.  Shame on you for dodging the real issue and then using the letter as an opportunity to attack Rev. Sharpton.  This is not about Rev. Sharpton.  It’s about the cartoon being blatantly racist and offensive.

I believe in freedom of speech, and you have every right to print what you want.  But freedom of speech still comes with responsibilities and consequences.  You are responsible for printing this cartoon, and I hope you experience some real l consequences for it.  I’m personally boycotting your paper and won’t do any interviews with any of your reporters, and I encourage all of my colleagues in the entertainment business to do so as well.  I implore your advertisers to seriously reconsider their business relationships with you as well.

You should print an apology in your paper acknowledging that this cartoon was ignorant, offensive and racist and should not have been printed.

I’m well aware of our country’s history of racism and violence, but I truly believe we are better than this filth.  As we attempt to rise above our difficult past and look toward a better future, we don’t need the New York Post to resurrect the images of Jim Crow to deride the new administration and put black folks in our place.  Please feel free to criticize and honestly evaluate our new President, but do so without the incendiary images and rhetoric.

Sincerely,

John Legend

Posted in 13-17yrs, 18 & over, 8-12yrs, civic duty, commentary | Leave a comment

Guns that look real sold across the street from an elementary school

One of the real-like guns being sold in the gas station store across the street from the elementary school.

Letter sent to local senator. We are responsible for our community.

Good Morning Senator Stewart-Cousins,

During the Christmas toy and furniture giveaway, I spoke briefly with you about the issue of no speed bumps around School 13 on McLean Avenue in Yonkers. Presently, there’s another more serious issue facing this same community. Our local BP Gas Station has recently added toys to their store inventory but they made the bad choice of including TOY GUNS with the other toys. There appear to be three different types of TOY GUNS patrons can purchase and two of them look real. It is irresponsible beyond measure for BP Executives to choose a high crime neighborhood like ours to sell these toys. We are living in a state of turmoil over here in the third precinct district and the crime statistics prove that fact.

Another one of the toy guns being sold in the store

Please look into this situation or have someone on your staff take a look. It’s the BP Gas Station on the corner of McLean Avenue and Pelton Avenue, DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 13. Our police department has enough on their hands on a daily basis. This is a potential threat to the little quality of life we have left.

A picture from the playground of the elementary school across the street.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Kind regards,
Adrienne Evans  (mother of Ashley J)

Posted in 13-17yrs, 18 & over, 8-12yrs, civic duty, commentary | Leave a comment

Despite My Disabilities: Lots to overcome b4 I was 1

My name is Barbara but I truthfully prefer to be called Barbie. I was born and raised in Brooklyn, New York. I now live in Puerto Rico (I’ll explain in my next installment). I was born prematurely as a result a result I have a host of disabilities. The primary of which is known as Hydrocephalus, this condition literally means I have water in the brain. How is this treated may be your question? A shunt. What is a shunt? A shunt is a small plastic tube that goes from the brain to the stomach, which drains cerebral-spinal fluid. This condition affected many areas of my brain such as the areas controlling my muscle strength and to a certain extent my eyes.

The disease affected my strength in that a regular person is able to twist a bone and is able to splint it and go I, on the other hand must be operated if I have a severe sprain. I also am losing my eyesight at a fast rate currently I have night blindness as well as poor depth perception. In addition to this I am bipolar with psychotic features. That diagnosis was arrived at through my father’s bloodline and the psychotic features is simply because I may be speaking to you and may happily thinking of ways to hurt my self not to worry I am medicated and under control (LOL).

I am also an epileptic, for those of you who do not know epilepsy is a condition where the brain’s electricity does not work properly causing seizures or involuntary movements of the body while a person loses consciousness. I get migraines as a result of the hydrocephalus and trove of other conditions. What I just I just gave you were the most severe and chronic.

The main thing to keep in mind as I tell you my story is the prognosis (life expectancy and quality of life) of a hydrocephalic. Generally this condition is congenital (a person is born with it) I was not; mine was acquired (it was caused by malpractice). The quality of life of a hydrocephalic is worse the longer it takes to diagnose it because water pressure damages the brain. In my case the shunt was implanted at three days old. However my prognosis was the following: I was to be a quadriplegic (paralyzed from the neck down) unable to do any of my functions for myself. Forever dependent on others academically and vocationally I was to reach a HS if that at best going through special education at best.

I decided to bore you with a bit of my medical history so you would truly understand the rest of my story and where I was coming from. My next installment should be overcoming my obstacles and education.

*Barbara graduated Summa come laude with a degree in psychology and counseling more specifically school counseling. She is currently finishing her masters in marriage in marriage and fan counseling.
Posted in 13-17yrs, 18 & over, 8-12yrs, Blog, blog series | Leave a comment

Life Essentials for Success: Raw Fish and Lumpy Grits

So after surviving the third interview, making it through the hiring and orientation process you are now happily settled it at your new job. The job is going well, your co- workers are nice and you are finally feeling at ease in your new work home. The bliss and euphoria of this new situation is wonderful. Then the inevitable happens…the honeymoon ends. Something happens and you are forced to come to grips with a fact that is real and raw—your co- workers are human and they are not perfect. I know that the shock may take time to wear off but allow yourself time to let that reality sink into your mind.

In every relationship personal or professional, there will come a time where a misunderstanding may occur, there may be anger and hurt feelings. This is just a part of the human existence. There is harmony and then discord only to swing back (hopefully soon) to harmony. Sometimes a situation can spiral seemingly out of control. It may cause you to pause and wonder how you arrived at that point. I liken this situation to a pot of raw fish and lumpy grits.

You have to decide whether you will work with what is in the pot by plucking out the previously clean raw fish and rinsing it off. Then seasoning it properly and cooking it separately. Afterwards, you return to the pot of grits and strain out all the lumps, mash the lumps into a paste and add water and begin again to cook the grits or do you throw away the whole pot of raw fish and lumpy grits and take the loss. Just like anything worth having you must count the cost. You may have to decide whether or not this situation is worth reconciling. Is it worth investing the time and effort that it would require for you to work out the details by allowing both sides to have their say while the other listens and then switch? Only you can decide.

In essence, it’s about first being honest with yourself and then with your friend or co-worker. While the idea of being honest is not a difficult one sometimes it may prove to be much more challenging when you do not want to hurt a friend’s feelings or create an uncomfortable situation with colleagues. Open honest communication is so important to any relationship. Using your words leaves no room for misinterpretation which can at times add more fuel to an already out of control raging fire. Letting your needs and concerns be known is great since not many of us are gifted mind readers. So what do you do with this pot of raw fish and lumpy grits? It’s easy enough to say I do not eat or like fish or grits—throw it away. But sometimes you have to think about what will be the long term impact to you should you terminate this relationship? Do you throw away the invested time you have put into the friendship or work relationship?

The termination of a friendship that is woven into the web of workplace politics can be sticky. If both parties are not careful co-workers may feel like they are caught in the middle and that they have to select sides. This type of situation is not conducive to productivity. So how do you deal with such a situation? It begins with the two original parties. Admittedly, someone can be angry with you and you are unaware of the reason why. Beginning dialogue on a situation that is painful or uncomfortable can prove to be difficult but you may have to talk about ugly things to get to a better place. Sometimes one party wants to resolve the situation while the other does not want to resolve the situation. The refusal to resolve a situation can sometimes be a power play but ultimately, you have to accept people where they are at?

This may mean that you may have to accept the fact that the relationship has changed and now will only have a professional aspect. This is not always easy because you have become use to a certain level of rapport and now you have to limit the level of interaction and intimacy you have with this person and the details of their life. Unfortunately, not everyone can go from friendship to just being professional but this will be critical to having a productive work environment free of gasoline fueled hostility. It’s all about perspective. You can view and use this change in your relationship as an opportunity to deepen your professional relationship. Perhaps you never looked at your former friend’s great work ethic because you were always working together and you took it for granted. This can give you a chance to view them at work from a different vantage point. You may be surprised at what good skills and talents your former friend has that you never noticed. While the idea of not having a perfect workplace is hard it is not realistic when human beings are involved.

This situation is like two people that have just gotten married. They must let go of the wedding phase in order to enjoy the honeymoon phase. Then they must let go of the honeymoon phase to enter the married life phase which is the beginning of getting to know each other as you live or work together. You can not grow and move onto the next phase without releasing the phase before. Perhaps you may feel comfortable in one phase or another. When you stay suck in or cling to one phase there’s no real growth and a false expectation. No real honeymoon lasts forever. Until you have had that first disagreement you are living ‘politely’. Successful living is about growth. So now that you know that your co- workers are not perfect and not surprisingly that they already knew that you were not perfect you can now begin the real work of working together as a team toward your common goal.

Posted in 13-17yrs, 8-12yrs, Motivational (Coaching, Speaking, etc), Wellness, blog series, commentary, inspirational, personal development | Leave a comment

“Harvard of China” or “Beida of U.S.”?

High school seniors in every country around the world need to think about their futures. Some of them want to work after high school, while others prefer to pursue further education. Those who want to pursue higher education cannot avoid asking themselves a question: “Which college should I go to?” Obviously, different students aim to study at different colleges. Thus, excellent students always look to the best universities in their countries. For example, top high school students in the U.S. consider Harvard University, while the most intelligent students in China dream of Peking University, or “Beida” as it is called colloquially. Because China has become as influential as the U.S. in the world, many people believe that the best Chinese university is comparable to the best American university. This belief is only partially true. Although Peking University and Harvard University share some similarities, they differ in terms of admissions processes, teaching methods, and campus culture.

Peking University and Harvard University have similar academic reputations and admissions requirements. Both universities maintain excellent academic reputations. As the most prestigious university in China, Peking University places significant emphasis on academics. The university faculty is composed of 58 members in the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 7 members in the Chinese Academy of Engineering, and 15 members in the Third World Academy of Sciences. Almost 100% of its faculty members have obtained doctorates. Peking University also has the largest university library in Asia. Similarly, Harvard University, one of the best universities in U.S., has the best scholars in the nation, including Nobel Laureates, Pulitzer Prize winners, and National Book Award winners. Harvard also has the largest university library system in the nation. In addition, both universities are extremely selective. Each year, Peking University only accepts around 3000 students out of more than 10 million students who take the National College Entrance Examination. Likewise, Harvard University only accepts about 6% of its applicants each year.

Despite the similarities between these two universities, Peking University and Harvard University differ from each other in the admissions process. Admission to Peking University solely depends on students’ scores in the Gaokao, which is the Chinese National College Entrance Examination. They only accept students whose scores are among the top 100 in a province. For example, in 2010, Peking University accepted 37 students out of 615 thousand high school students in Guangdong Province. All 37 students’ scores in the 2010 Gaokao were among the top 50 scores in the province. However, Harvard’s admissions process is more complicated and comprehensive. The factors that influence the chance of admission include standardized test scores, high school grades, high school courses, extracurricular activities, leadership ability, application essays, and a personal statement. Because Harvard’s admission officers pay attention to each of these factors, excellence in test scores alone is insufficient.  Therefore, unlike Peking University, Harvard University does not place significant emphasis on students’ scores, but students’ well-roundedness.

In addition, teaching methods distinguish these two universities. Peking University focuses more on memorization rather than on the application of concepts. At Peking University, the professors believe that memorization of theories and facts can lead to a good application of knowledge. Hence, they tend to present their knowledge straightforwardly and urge students to memorize the information. In many classes, professors lecture the students and the students take notes, but few class discussions happen. At Harvard, the professors value students’ class participation, and therefore choose class discussion as one of the main teaching methods. In a class discussion, students can express their own ideas freely to the professor, who welcomes different ideas from the students. Via the class discussions, the professors can inspire the students to use the knowledge in their real lives.

Finally, the culture in each university demonstrates the most differences. The student body of Peking University consists of most of Chinese native students. Therefore, the culture in Peking University doesn’t seem quite diverse. Besides, because the university recruits students based on their scores, ignoring the importance of versatility, it is possible that some students in the university do not know anything else but study. In addition, because the courses at Peking University are intense, many students prefer to concentrate on their studies. Consequently, the university fully focuses on academics and leads the campus culture to become academically-oriented. If the culture of Peking University is a clear mirror, the culture of Harvard is a kaleidoscope. The student body of Harvard University consists of a population of various races including Africans, Asians, Caucasians, Hispanics, Latinos, and Native Americans. The diversity of the student body enriches the culture of the campus through student organizations such as Czech and Slovak Society, Alliance for Africa, Latinas Unidas, etc.  Because the campus culture is rather open-minded, students with phenomenal versatilities eagerly participate in a wide range of student organizations and activities in fields from sciences to humanities.

Inheriting the Chinese rigorous and scrupulous traditions on academics, Peking University has led its students to climb to the top of academics, while Harvard University, a western higher education leader, has succeeded in raising versatile and comprehensive students. Because of globalization, students around the world can choose a college education in either oriental style or occidental style. Therefore, in order to make the right decision, they need to fully explore the differences between an eastern education and a western education. Exploring the differences between the best representatives of an oriental education and of an occidental education has provided them with some insightful ideas on that topic. If they are ready to immerse themselves in academics alone, an eastern education, like that offered by Peking University, is their best choice. Nevertheless, if they want to be well-rounded individuals, why not consider a western education like the one offered by Harvard?

Posted in 13-17yrs, Education, commentary, global citizenship | Leave a comment